| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Impy

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 5442
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Keep in mind there hasn't been a full disclosure of the autopsy findings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
suspiria_2
Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 8 Location: portland, oregon
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
that has always bothered me about this case.
what do we know to be a fact about what happened to her? we can't 'see' the supposed sodomy/material in her rectum. where does that come from? as far as i know, it comes from severed. i personally take all that comes from that direction with a big grain of salt.
what else, besides the photos and a few stray comments in the inquest, do we have to ascertain what occurred?
i tried to comment on this once before, in that i could 'see' from photographs that there is a wound above her pubic region and below her navel which has been sliced open. to me, the wound seems to gape more than is necessary if it had just been cut at and left alone. it suggests that something had been placed there at one time, stretching out the opening of that wound as one can see in it is in some of the photos. at that time, i theorized that she had been impaled with something but other, more gruesome thoughts that i'm afraid to even really confront directly come to mind.
whoever started this topic, as morbid as it may be, is on the right track. so far, the conclusion seems to be that the person committing this crime needed a significant amount of privacy and control to carry out what was done. that makes it seem highly unlikely to me that it would have been in a motel, hotel or boarding house of any kind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|