| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stereocrumb
 Joined: 22 Sep 2006 Posts: 1174 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"It is indeed possible and common for eyes to open after death, even if they were closed at the time of death. This is due to chemical changes occurring in the muscles within the first few hours, causing them to contract and stiffen. This process is called rigor mortis. Rigor mortis tends to affect the smallest muscles first, and then spread throughout the larger muscles. Typically, rigor is first apparent in the small muscles of the eyelids, then the lower jaw and neck, followed by the limbs. The muscles of the eyelids are called orbicularis oculi and levator palpebrae superioris. In life, orbicularis oculi is used to close the eyelids, while levator palpebrae superioris lifts the upper eyelid to open the eye. When rigor affects the levator muscles first, the eyelids open and the muscles stiffen. Thus, when rigor affects the orbicularis muscles shortly afterwards, the force of contraction they produce is not enough to overcome the stiffness of the levator muscles and the eyes remain open. Rigor mortis continues for a day or two and then the muscles soften as decomposition sets in."
(taken fron www.nurseminerva.co.uk)
Just thought that information would be of interest to people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAWS
 Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 1584 Location: Beverly Hills 90210
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice research. That shuts ME up --  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAWS
 Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 1584 Location: Beverly Hills 90210
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BTW -- I just remembered that in SEVERED, JAW recounts to Gilmore about Beth's eyes being open in a dead stare, while she was in the bathtub, after being drained of blood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stereocrumb
 Joined: 22 Sep 2006 Posts: 1174 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah if you believe that Jack Anderson Wilson was there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAWS
 Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 1584 Location: Beverly Hills 90210
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Or maybe he saw the morgue photos (through Gilmore?) before recounting that story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jam Tart

 Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Posts: 331
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's an interesting possibility, JAWS. There so much murky room to manoeuvre in, where Gilmore and is sources are concerned. _________________ -------------
...the world's more full of weeping
than you can understand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stereocrumb
 Joined: 22 Sep 2006 Posts: 1174 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah I'll have to agree with Jam on that one.. and Jack anderson Wilson could've just made the story up just to get drinks out of Gilmore...J.A.W. did have a few drunk/intoxicated arrests on his rap sheet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nora Charles
 Joined: 17 Dec 2006 Posts: 181
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suthernprog
 Joined: 21 Feb 2007 Posts: 37 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Briar wrote: | | It looks more, to me, like she was wearing glasses and was hit with them on leaving marks from the nose rest thingymajig. |
That's the first thing I thought too. I really can't come up with any reason for goggles to be placed on her. I mean, even trying to think like the killer....goggles? For what?? But....did she wear glasses?
Prog _________________ "Twenty-five wives in the lake tonight, twenty-five snakes pour out your eyes."- The Mars Volta |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suthernprog
 Joined: 21 Feb 2007 Posts: 37 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Briar wrote: | Hey is anyone experienced in the art of bondage and able to tell us all about the equipment??
Hehe
**can't wait to see who answers THIS one** |
Umm.....haven't run across any. Sorry I dig up a months old topic. Got carried away in my reading.
Prog _________________ "Twenty-five wives in the lake tonight, twenty-five snakes pour out your eyes."- The Mars Volta |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suthernprog
 Joined: 21 Feb 2007 Posts: 37 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm. She seemed worried and/or scared. When found, her hair had been dyed. Was this dying process something she could do herself, or did she go to a salon? Anyway, perhaps she was in disguise trying to leave LA, dyed hair and glasses, and was still wearing them when the first blow to the face dug them into her nose, and knocked her unconcious when she was kidnapped.
Prog _________________ "Twenty-five wives in the lake tonight, twenty-five snakes pour out your eyes."- The Mars Volta |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Briar

 Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 6281 Location: MHOville, Utah.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Suthernprog wrote: | Hmm. She seemed worried and/or scared. When found, her hair had been dyed. Was this dying process something she could do herself, or did she go to a salon? Anyway, perhaps she was in disguise trying to leave LA, dyed hair and glasses, and was still wearing them when the first blow to the face dug them into her nose, and knocked her unconcious when she was kidnapped.
Prog |
The sunglasses theory is a really great one. I like it, Prog. _________________ We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change we seek. ~Barack Obama |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stereocrumb
 Joined: 22 Sep 2006 Posts: 1174 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sunglasses, would be a good explanation for the marks on her nose. nice idea,Prog. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAWS
 Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 1584 Location: Beverly Hills 90210
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I wonder if Newbarr, the autopsy surgeon, speculated on what might have caused those marks. I think Impy theorized once, that it looked like the bridge of her nose was grabbed and tweaked with a pair of pliers. That's what it looks like to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stereocrumb
 Joined: 22 Sep 2006 Posts: 1174 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I wouldn't rule out that possiblity. I think I said something about pliers once too. But if she was wearing aviator style sunglasses..the nose pads would probably leave marks had she been hit in the face with an object |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BisectedBeauty
 Joined: 04 Jul 2008 Posts: 18 Location: Femphis
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Various tools I think or have thought responsible for her wounds
*butcher's knife (the mouth and torso cutting)
*scalpel (the criss cross slashes on her v)
*crowbar (the head gouges.)
*that farm tool that looks like giant sharp tongs
anyone familiar with farm equipment?
(the nose wounds)
...this list will likely grow the more I study the photos in depth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wasgo
 Joined: 03 Jun 2008 Posts: 591 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Autumn wrote: | | It seems like it would be hard to keep pliers on someone's nose while they are struggling (presuming that she was conscious and struggling at the time) to get them off and get free. |
maybe some kind of vise grip? those hold real good when screwed, regardless of how fidgety, slimey (like fish), they hold. i'de wonder if the markings would match? and if the bone breakage would match. IE... if her nose was slowly crushed as opposed to being punched, or hit with something, if that can be determined? _________________ ~wipes sweat off brow~ glad that's over!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slytherin88
Joined: 24 Apr 2009 Posts: 2 Location: Utah
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JAWS wrote: | | Ro wrote: | | I have often wondered if some of the patches (on the thigh and breast) could have been completed while she was still alive IF she was secured enough? |
It also makes you wonder if all the bloodshed -- while she WAS alive -- soiled a bed, a couch, or a carpet, that had to be cleaned or disposed of afterward -- or whether she was bound naked into a bathtub at the outset, the killer knowing that his cuttings were going to make a bloody mess. Several reports said that she might have been bound and slaughtered hanging from her ankles upside down like an animal, and that there were rope burns on her wrists, neck, and ankles. Wherever she was butchered, it's apparent that the killer was not concerned about her screaming and being heard. She was either gagged, or in a very isolated environment. |
I don't think she was gagged it would have gotten in the way of the cuts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BurnsoutBright
Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
where is everyone seeing these pictures. I just started reading about all this and I'm not sure what to look at first. Everything is so sad _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Impy

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 5442
|
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shouldn't be hard to find around the net. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JPS
 Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 112 Location: Downtown Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
.
I am amazed that the moderator couldn't do better than
| Impy wrote: | | Shouldn't be hard to find around the net. |
Try this page as a starting point, it's on this site, Bethshort.com.
http://www.bethshort.com/the-murder.php
| BurnsoutBright wrote: | where is everyone seeing these pictures. I just started reading
about all this and I'm not sure what to look at first. Everything is so sad |
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Impy

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 5442
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fair enough. I don't think the OP did any searching or they would have found the link on the front page, but whatever, i can indulge them.
The most graphic I've come across. This is probably what you're after. You have been warned.
http://poetry.rotten.com/black-dahlia/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chrissie
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a theory about the wounds on her forehead - forgive me if it has been discussed before. The lesions on her forehead are jagged and in a circular configuration. These marks could be a result of a glass object being thrown at her face and the object shattering upon impact on her forehead. The object I suspect the most would be the bottom of a shotglass due to the size and shape of the lesion zone. The shattering glass would have fanned out, thus the unharmed area in the center. If one of the major causes of death was blood loss it is entirely possible the lesions on her forehead were the cause. If a vein had been severed there would have been major blood loss.
How I came up with this theory:
I have had a glass object thrown at my head, shattered upon impact, and had similar very lesions. I severed a vein and the doctor told me that one of the quickest ways to bleed to death is a head injury similar to mine.
My injuries were not in the same location as Elizabeth's - mine were close to my right temple - but the similarities between our lesions are shocking.
Now, why would a shotglass be thrown at her? Perhaps she got in a fight with someone, that person threw their drink at her and thus started the downward spiral. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Impy

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 5442
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think it's feasible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
startouched
 Joined: 05 Nov 2009 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay....here's my theroy on the tools used:
The majority of the cuts on the face, genitilia, and other superficial wounds were made with what we call and "exacto knife" not sure if a tiny scapel could make the same marks, but possibly....
The instrument that was used to stretch (sodomize) her anus was the same instrument that was used for blunt force trauma to her head and possible the killing blow. I am really surprised that the autopsy didn't reveal more about the items based the shape of the wounds to the head. Perhaps they didn't think about shaving her head in the wound areas?
I am not sure if I saw anywhere the exact demensions of the piece of skin that was removed and stuffed into the vagina, but I think I remember that being a large enough chunk to have fat attached.
As far as the cuts on the lips, I think that is significant to the killer. Perhaps the number of times she had "kissed" him without meaning?
Again, I think this killer had much time to spend with Beth for the postmortem activities. Once he actually had her under his control, (I read somewhere that possible those marks on the sides of the nostrils could have been made by glasses, perhaps he wanted her to "see" how she had rejected him) he may have killed her with blunt force more quickly than he wanted, but not before he sexually assaulted her. I suspect he struck her to quiet her, then proceeded with the torture to her face, then the sexual assault, then when he realized that she was dead, he took all the time he needed to tell his story on her body.
All this leads me to believe that a "set" of instruments was used. And, that the killer had time to plan this, probably going over how he would do it, how she would look, and how HE would feel.
Good grief, I am I morbid serial killer???? LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|