The Black Dahlia Web SiteLooking for Justice for Beth
About BethThe MurderThe InvestigationMediaInterviewsBooks, TV & MusicMessage BoardsComments
The Black Dahlia Message Boards
Back Home
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The book Review
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Black Dahlia Message Boards Forum Index -> THE BLACK DAHLIA FILES
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TIMMM55


.....
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 599
Location: SAN DIEGO

PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Impy wrote:
Well, as Larry has so sardonically proven, the whole book is a sham.

But c'mon, lying about night life in LA in the 40's? Are you retarded?


1940's Los Angeles probably had a more happening night life than Modern LA.


And i quote:


"THERE WASN'T MUCH nightlife in Los Angeles back in the 1940's. Most people went to bed early. Even in Hollywood the streets were empty, and the town was pretty dead by 10:00 P.M."




Right, and i'm Gene Krupa.


I've got an album full of photos, lots from places quite a bit less swinging than Los Angeles that prove that the Greatest Generation liked the nightlife just fine.



It MAY have been dead at 10:00....but probably picked back up at 10:30! Very Happy Idea They were probably at the movies or dinner. When I lived there people didn't go out to the bars/dancing till 11 or 12.
_________________
I've been following Beth for years, and lived and worked near her haunts and never knew it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Impy


Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5485

PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even if that was the case, i still stand by my accusation that Wolfe is a liar and worse still, likely guilty of libel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
ravenman71


.....
Joined: 13 Oct 2006
Posts: 385
Location: b-more

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought I'd give this book a chance until I started reading Larry Harnisch's blog. Right off the bat he found things that were not true. But what really puts the nail in the coffin for this book is that the author cut and pasted different documents from the DA file into one and passes it off as authentic. What a fraud.
http://lmharnisch.blogspot.com/2006/04/blogging-wolfe-book-how-to-fake.html

What really burned my ass about this book was that I waited very anxiously for it to be released, hoping for some new information on the case only to find out it was full of crap. I'm glad Larry blogged the book the way he did. I learned a lot more about the case through his blog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Briar


.....
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 6281
Location: MHOville, Utah.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naw those peeps in Impy's pictures got a good start at being that happy and I guarantee many of those guys were asleep in the doghouse by 1 a.m. Wink
_________________
We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change we seek. ~Barack Obama
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TIMMM55


.....
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 599
Location: SAN DIEGO

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK done.

I give it a D

Other than the good pictures there's very little to redeem this book.
_________________
I've been following Beth for years, and lived and worked near her haunts and never knew it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JMW


.....
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 514
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I kinda liked reading this book, however I didn't believe any of it. I like reading about mob stuff, even if it's fiction!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TIMMM55


.....
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 599
Location: SAN DIEGO

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was buying the Bugsy Segal mob/rage killing. Bugsy was crazy, I could see that. And Beth did hang around with some unsavory characters and lacked any known means of income. I could see where she may have gotten caught up in the wrong crowd. Even the Jean Spangler scenario made sense.

Wolfe's Old Hollywood tales of the mob and stars has a ring of truth to it.

But then Wolfe reached too far with the B-girl, LAPD cover up and Chandler/baby connection. He piled too much conjecture on top of one another with no proof. And then filled in the blanks with Severed.
_________________
I've been following Beth for years, and lived and worked near her haunts and never knew it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Enigmatic


.....
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 955
Location: SoCal

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We (well, mostly me from an uninformed perspective) sort of knocked this whole idea around a while back. I was only vaguely aware of Wolfe's theory when it came up, but there is just enough not inconsistent with the timing of the events to make a fanciful tale, if you're the sort to fill in blanks with unprovable speculation and what may or may not be coincidences of timing.

http://www.bethshort.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=6738

p.s. I still haven't read Wolfe's book.
_________________
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." H.L. Mencken
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TIMMM55


.....
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 599
Location: SAN DIEGO

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Enigmatic wrote:
We (well, mostly me from an uninformed perspective) sort of knocked this whole idea around a while back. I was only vaguely aware of Wolfe's theory when it came up, but there is just enough not inconsistent with the timing of the events to make a fanciful tale, if you're the sort to fill in blanks with unprovable speculation and what may or may not be coincidences of timing.

http://www.bethshort.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=6738

p.s. I still haven't read Wolfe's book.


As you'd probably guess I wouldn't recommend BDF, other than for the pix and to fill your bookshelf Sad
_________________
I've been following Beth for years, and lived and worked near her haunts and never knew it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
SaySomething


....
Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 189

PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a follow-up to an ancient posting but...

Impy wrote:
Even if that was the case, i still stand by my accusation that Wolfe is a liar and worse still, likely guilty of libel.


Libel against who?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Impy


Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5485

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the very least Beth and Norman Chandler. If i think about it i'm sure most of the books have a libelous slant.



Of course, when someone's dead there isn't much you can't say about them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
SaySomething


....
Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 189

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Impy wrote:
At the very least Beth and Norman Chandler. If i think about it i'm sure most of the books have a libelous slant.

Of course, when someone's dead there isn't much you can't say about them.


Bingo. Once someone is dead there isn’t ANYTHING you can’t say about them. There are no legal repercussions whatsoever. That’s important to keep in mind when reading any of these books.

If this wasn’t true, most of the BD books couldn’t be published…

Steve Hodel would be busted on the Man Ray stuff alone, even though MR is a public figure. It would be kind of hard to argue the slanderous stuff about him in BDA wasn’t published with knowledge that it was false or reckless disregard for whether it was true or false.

Larry Harnisch would have to hew to a higher standard, because Bayley and von Partyka were not public figures. He’d have to avoid saying anything that was damaging and false, even he didn’t know it was false. He’s pretty circumspect on his website, although I don’t think he could get away with saying (as fact) that the probability that Bayley did it is very high. The evidence he gives to support it just isn’t strong enough say that. He’s seems to be on solid ground, otherwise.

Believe it or not, I think Mary Pacios would be in the clear. I think she cherry-picks her facts to make her case against Welles, but they do seem to be genuine facts. If I was her publisher, I’d check into the paid-off rape claim to see if it came from a reputable source, but that’s about it.

Gilmore is in a weird grey area, because so many people in his book are just made up. I think he’d be in for a lawsuit from Beth, at least.

I’d have to go over the Wolfe book again to figure out how many people, public and private, could win libel sues against him, if the dead could sue. Lots, though.

And let’s not even talk about Janice Knowlton.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Impy


Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5485

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't read the book (yet, maybe, depends on my boredom level one day), but i can't figure out what the hell Thelma Todd has to do with anything. She'd been dead for 11 years.

Unless Wolfe is simply name-dropping.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
SaySomething


....
Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 189

PostPosted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Impy wrote:
I haven't read the book (yet, maybe, depends on my boredom level one day), but i can't figure out what the hell Thelma Todd has to do with anything. She'd been dead for 11 years.


Bugsy rubbed her out, too. And it was all a big cover-up. According to Wolfe, of course.

Quote:
Unless Wolfe is simply name-dropping.


Well, yeah, there's that...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Impy


Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 5485

PostPosted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, Bugsy was responsible for every suspicious death in LA until '47.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
joe78


....
Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 179

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:09 pm    Post subject: Hmmm Reply with quote

No I have not read the book and to be honest I probally won't read any other book on the Dhalia! I don't think any of them are true. They will just add more myth to the case. The evidence is stale, if it exist at all, and people are left up to their imaginations. Unless we can see the LAPD files, if any are left, I have no interest in reading any other theory outside this board. Now if LAPD will publish a book with the orginal files I will read it. But I have already lost track of how many suspects we have now and I don't want any new ones that are not backed up by pure hard facts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Briar


.....
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 6281
Location: MHOville, Utah.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the LAPD publishes anything it will be the Black Dahlia Fairy Tales.
_________________
We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change we seek. ~Barack Obama
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Black Dahlia Message Boards Forum Index -> THE BLACK DAHLIA FILES All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group